Stripe Faces Criticism Over Launch of New Layer-1 Blockchain, Tempo

John Darbie
Photo: Finoracle.net

Stripe Launches Tempo Blockchain Amidst Industry Skepticism

Stripe’s recent announcement of its own layer-1 blockchain, named Tempo, has generated a split reaction within the cryptocurrency community. The payment giant’s CEO, Patrick Collison, stated that existing blockchains fall short in supporting the growing volume of stablecoin transactions on Stripe’s platform, prompting the development of Tempo to meet demands exceeding 10,000 transactions per second (TPS) at peak times.

Industry Experts Question Need for New Blockchain

Several crypto professionals expressed skepticism about Stripe’s decision to create a new blockchain rather than leveraging established networks. Joe Petrich, head of engineering at NFT platform Courtyard, remarked, “No one wants another chain,” emphasizing that scalability challenges have already been addressed by current blockchains for those committed to blockchain use.

Disputed Claims on Transaction Speeds

Collison compared Tempo’s target throughput with Bitcoin’s approximate 5 TPS, Ethereum’s 20 TPS, and newer platforms like Base and Solana, which he estimated at around 1,000 TPS. However, Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius Labs and a Solana advocate, criticized these figures as “hilariously wrong,” referencing Solana Explorer data that showed over 3,000 TPS at the time of publication.

Supporters Highlight Potential Benefits

Not all responses were critical. Steve Milton, CEO of Web3 wallet provider Fintopia, called Tempo a “game-changer” that could provide the high-scale on-chain payment infrastructure necessary for faster and more cost-effective transactions. Similarly, Max Segal, COO of Privy, expressed optimism about the new blockchain’s prospects.

Debate Over Layer-1 vs. Layer-2 Solutions

Some commentators questioned why Stripe opted for a layer-1 blockchain instead of building Tempo as a layer-2 solution atop Ethereum. Devansh Mehta of the Ethereum Foundation suggested that decentralizing and diversifying validator sets is preferable to creating a new network. Crypto analyst Leo Lanza proposed that as an Ethereum layer-2, Tempo could leverage Ethereum’s security and interoperability while offering custom transaction speeds and fiat-denominated fees.

Stripe’s Rationale for Fiat-Denominated Fees

Collison emphasized the importance of fees denominated in fiat currencies for real-world financial applications, contrasting this with existing blockchains that require fees in native tokens. He expressed hope that Tempo would facilitate a range of on-chain financial activities, including payment acceptance, global payouts, remittances, and microtransactions.

Share This Article
Follow:
John Darbie is a seasoned cryptocurrency analyst and writer with over 10 years of experience in the blockchain and digital assets industry. A graduate of MIT with a degree in Computer Science and Engineering, John specializes in blockchain technology, cryptocurrency markets, and decentralized finance (DeFi). His insights have been featured in leading publications such as CoinDesk, CryptoSlate, and Bitcoin Magazine. John’s articles are renowned for their thorough research, clear explanations, and practical insights, making them a reliable source of information for readers interested in cryptocurrency. He actively follows industry trends and developments, regularly participating in blockchain conferences and webinars. With a strong reputation for expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, John Darbie continues to provide high-quality content that helps individuals and businesses navigate the evolving world of digital assets.