China Restricts AI Use in Funding Applications & Releases New Guidelines

John Darbie
Photo: Finoracle.me

China Releases Guidelines for Responsible Research Conduct

The Ministry of Science and Technology in China has recently released the Guidelines For Responsible Research Conduct, aimed at promoting the “healthy development” of scientific research. These guidelines cover various aspects of the research process, including topic selection and peer review, with ethics, safety, and transparency as the main considerations.

Ban on Direct Use of AI in Scientific Research Funding Applications

One notable aspect of the guidelines is the ban on the “direct” use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) when applying for research funding and approval. The rules apply to individual researchers and institutions, including universities and medical and health centers. Although generative AI can still be used in research, any content or findings that use the technology must be clearly labeled as such. The guidelines also specify that AI-generated content cannot be listed as a co-author in research papers under the new rules.

Ethical Concerns Surrounding AI-Generated Content in Research

The use of AI-generated content has sparked ethical concerns in the scientific community. Some scientists have listed AI tools, such as ChatGPT, as co-authors, but many journals have already stopped this practice. However, this has prompted discussions about whether AI should be credited if it discovers new materials or drugs, raising a broader philosophical debate about whether it should be considered equal to humans in the pursuit of knowledge.

Mixed Opinions on the Impact of AI Guidelines in Scientific Fields

Opinions on the impact of the guidelines vary among researchers in different scientific fields. Some researchers believe that the regulations will have limited effects, especially in scientific archaeology, where generative AI tends to produce poor-quality project application proposals. However, others argue that the widespread use of generative AI is an irreversible trend and that banning it across the board is unrealistic and unreasonable. They suggest finding ways to allow researchers to use AI in an appropriate way while keeping up with international trends.

China Expands Regulations on AI in Scientific Research

The release of these guidelines is part of China’s broader efforts to regulate the use of AI in various sectors. Last year, the country implemented the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services, which promote the “healthy” development of publicly available AI content. These measures do not apply to scientific research institutes as long as they do not provide generative AI services to the Chinese public. The new guidelines on responsible research conduct expand upon these interim measures, addressing ethical concerns and specifying labeling requirements for AI-generated content in research papers.

In conclusion, the release of the Guidelines For Responsible Research Conduct in China demonstrates the country’s commitment to promoting ethical, safe, and transparent scientific research. The ban on the direct use of generative AI in research funding applications aims to ensure fair competition and prevent potential ethical issues associated with AI-generated content. While opinions on the impact of these guidelines vary, they reflect China’s ongoing efforts to regulate the use of AI in scientific research and adapt to technological advancements in an ever-evolving field.

Analyst comment

Neutral news: China Releases Guidelines for Responsible Research Conduct

As an analyst, it is expected that the market will not see significant changes as a direct result of these guidelines. However, there may be potential implications for the use of generative AI in scientific research funding applications, with some researchers seeing limited effects while others argue for a more adaptive approach. Overall, these guidelines demonstrate China’s commitment to ethical research practices and reflect the ongoing efforts to regulate AI in scientific research.

Share This Article
Follow:
John Darbie is a seasoned cryptocurrency analyst and writer with over 10 years of experience in the blockchain and digital assets industry. A graduate of MIT with a degree in Computer Science and Engineering, John specializes in blockchain technology, cryptocurrency markets, and decentralized finance (DeFi). His insights have been featured in leading publications such as CoinDesk, CryptoSlate, and Bitcoin Magazine. John’s articles are renowned for their thorough research, clear explanations, and practical insights, making them a reliable source of information for readers interested in cryptocurrency. He actively follows industry trends and developments, regularly participating in blockchain conferences and webinars. With a strong reputation for expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, John Darbie continues to provide high-quality content that helps individuals and businesses navigate the evolving world of digital assets.